| Recent Articles |
Options Scandal Hitting Apple Stock
[2006-08-04] Shares of Apple dropped by four percent in after-hours trading, and
the iconic computer company may have to restate earnings for several years due...
Sleeping Macbooks
[2006-08-03] MacBooks and iBooks can be put to sleep simply by closing the lid.
That's the method I usually use when I'm done for the day: just close the lid.
Fugu
SSH/SFTP Client
Fugu boasts an Apple Design award for Best Mac OS X Use of Open Source. As expected, I found myself wondering why the heck you need a gui interface for scp or sftp, but actually it turned out to be useful and .. I liked it.
DeskBrowse Available For Free
It's "lightweight and has a very responsive interface." It's "innovative," and
offers "blazing speed." Maybe I watched too much racing yesterday, but this sounds
like...
|
|
08.17.06
Mac OS X: Time Machine
 By
A.P. Lawrence
Apple has added something they are calling Time Machine to the upcoming "Leopard" release of OS X.
My very first thought was that they've wrapped a gui front-end around filesystem versioning or snapshots. That would be the logical way to do this; otherwise you waste a tremendous amount of unnecessary space for backup:
(From
MacWorld):
How will Time Machine work for people who modify gigantic files on a regular basis? For example, consider a 1GB database file. If I make a tiny modification to that file, Time Machine writes out another 1GB file to record that change. As a result, drive space on my backup device could quickly disappear.
A while back, it was rumored that Apple might be working on ZFS for Leopard. Is that how they are doing this? Well, maybe, but others say "ZFS is not in the Leopard discussed at WWDC in any capacity"
Wanna
wallet stuffed with $10,000?
SalesGenius™. Free 30-day
Trial. |
|
Maybe they added versioning to HFS+?. It wouldn't seem all that hard to do given the metadata capabilities already present. Versioning itself isn't all that new; it goes back to DEC's TENEX and VMS filesystems. Even SCO implemented undelete with versioning. But no, the descriptions of Time Machine don't sound like versioning: they talk about having a separate drive for the backups. So that's probably not it.
So do they really duplicate data over and over again? That seems so unlikely. At the very least a simple version control diff method would cut down on that tremendously. But we don't yet know. Wikipedia's reference says:
It is unclear at this time whether Time Machine should be considered as a simple back-up utility or as a complete filesystem-level version control mechanism. Apple's website merely states that an API will be released so that third party developers can take advantage of Time Machine.
And that's where it stands for now.
*Originally published at APLawrence.com
About the Author:
A.P. Lawrence provides SCO Unix and Linux consulting services http://www.pcunix.com
|
